Obama Becomes Eunuch

Share with Friends

Obama Becomes Eunuch
A Eunuch
“refers to those castrated in order to perform a specific social function.”
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunuch



Headline says,
“Obama urged to use the prize as spur to peace”

Hmm, we all know he did not do anything to deserve this…

---------------------------------
Philippines
Sunday, October 11, 2009


Buy the Same Gear as Andy uses… Sold at three times the price, sorry.

---------------------------------

President Obama receive the Nobel Peace Prize for year 2009
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/index.html

I am embarrassed and ashamed to be from the USA. I can only hope and wish that President Obama “Mans Up” and refuses to accept. I accept Obama as my President of my country; he has done a good job so far in the nine months he has been in office.

I said to a British person,
“I do not want a President of Europe, I do not want a President of the Black people, I do not want a President of Democrats or Republican, I want a President of the United States.”

I believe the President has two major powers; one is to negotiate world policy and second is to lead the USA in time of war for the first 7-10 days before congress gets involve. I now feel the safety of the USA is diminished, Obama is an owned man.

I believe there is hope; I am not sure, but am hoping Obama can be leader of the free world and know this is an attempt to make him into the Europeans Black Houseboy. Yes, sir, No Sir, how high Sir? I know Europeans, they are generally racist to the bone, there is no way they look at Black people as equals, this is only in America, and the reason we now have a Black President.

I can hear the conversations around the world, we got him now, he wants the fame too much, and he cannot attack us now. He is the Pope of Peace, he is now carrying the Torch, and we all can sleep safe knowing he is neutered. Obama will not sacrifice his fame, the world opinion to defy us, he is now our houseboy.

President Obama, we all know you have not done anything to deserve this, please refuse to play this game.

Thank you

Andy Graham Citizen of the United States of America

Obama Becomes Eunuch

Affirmative action on a global scale....

But in the Presidents defence the other nominees where light weights.


The Peace Prize Second Place Finishers...
Chinese Human Rights Activist Hu Jia - imprisoned for campaigning for
human rights in the PRC, not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama.

Wei Jingsheng, who spent 17 years in Chinese prisons for urging
reforms of China's communist system. -- not as worthy as Barack
Hussein Obama. (Not to mention the symbolic value of awarding a
Chinese dissident on the 20th Anniversary of the Tianenmen Square
Massacre.)

Greg Mortenson, founder of the Central Asia Institute has built
80 schools, especially for girls, in remote areas of northern Pakistan
and Afghanistan over the past 15 years - not as worthy as Barack
Hussein Obama.

Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad, a philosophy professor in Jordan who risks
his life by advocating interfaith dialogue between Jews and Muslims,
also not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama.

Afghan human rights activist Sima Samar. She currently leads the
Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission and serves as the U.N.
special envoy to Darfur and is apparently also not as worthy as Barack
Hussein Obama.

Chuck WoW for over 10 years has traveled Asia and has helped more bar girls get the proper medical attention for their family's sick buffalo than you can shake a stick at. Not worthy.

Barack Hussein Obama - he's worthy of the Peace Prize for hoping and wishing and he did it all in 11 days. Nominations where finalized on February 1st 2009.


Gadget

So you are saying hoping and wishing is an accomplishment, I think a person who get this award should have an obvious something done. It is like giving me a reward for staying sober for 22 years.

Hmm, I stopped being a jerk for 22 years, there are people who have never drank. i truly believe this is the epitome of our age, all talk and no action, somehow talk is an action.


hoz

As I understand they awarded it to President Obama because of his weather change in dealing with other nations. No longer does the US have the "with us or against us", lie to get us into a war, cowboy mentality, President Obama practices DIPLOMACY.

Unfortunately, what "we" think has nothing to do with who gets the prize. Why can't we just enjoy the fact that a sitting President of the United States has won the Nobel PP? This second guessing is not productive.

And by what stretch of the imagination does winning the Nobel Peace prize become a negative?


Gadget

Diplomacy required you to do something, to make a change. he has only spent trillions and doubled the number of troops in Afghanistan, he has not doing anything yet.

It appears that Winning the Nobel Peace prize or getting a rewarded for doing nothing is the American way. I personally believe in merit and getting rewarded for accomplishments not talking. Being like is not an accomplishment,

I sure hope nobody thinks any of these countries are with us, if you do than you truly do not understand the ways of the world.

I want to read what he has done besides talking and spending trillions so every multi-national company and rich person in the USA has been saved.


Your self-centeredness has, for quite a while, gone beyond amusing. Bye, have a good life, the way you like it- all about Andy.


Andy,

I know you like to stoke the fires of controversy, but honestly, what president do you know of who wasn't a houseboy to somebody?

Was Bush Jr. not a houseboy?
Was Clinton not a houseboy?
Was Bush senior not a houseboy?
Was Reagan not a houseboy?

Honestly, there is nothing new under the sun. The only thing that changes is the demographic of people that get riled up about it, depending on whether there is a democrat or republican in office. Now, it is time for you to get riled up. When Bush was in office, it was your time to defend.

The reality is that the only thing that counts is if the quality of life becomes diminished or improved for most of the people in the country during the presidency. Despite what the media tells us is the truth, or what our ideals tells us is the truth, this quality of life gauge is the only one that can somewhat accurately enlighten as to how effective, and honest, a president actually was. In other words, they can all talk the talk, but its the rare few that walk the walk. Because of this, unfortunately, it generally takes years before we can accurately criticize or laud a president.


Gadget

I live with Europeans, I must listen, I cannot avoid listening to their opinions,

How do explain this every message above it talking about what President Obama can or could do in the future. The Nobel Peace prize is supposed to be for something already done.

The Housboy thing is an invalid comment, let me explain.

I am saying,

Obama is being made the Houseboy to the Nobel Peace Prize and the European people who are giving it to him.

Asking a question is not a proof, you say.

Was Bush Jr. not a houseboy?
Was Clinton not a houseboy?
Was Bush senior not a houseboy?
Was Reagan not a houseboy?

You should have said,
Bush to X
Clinton to X etc.

I am happy to have Obama for President, he has not deserted the Soldiers, he as best I understand doubled the number of Troops in Afghanistan. He is doing exactly the same as what I want him to do, but I want him to Man up and refuse to rewarded this truly manipulative award.

The reason I make this comment. I know the globe, I know the world, I know what Europeans are thinking better than my readers. BECAUSE I have traveled the world now perpetually for almost 12 years.

The aguments above do not give any reason, just talk,no clarity.

Chuck Wow gave the best, and I admit, there is no clear better choice,
Good reasonsing from Chuck, Thanks, all the others are just talking dreams.


Gadget

"award was thrust on Obama as politacal leverage."

This is the point, thank you Tom.

I think in four years, the changes made in Africa because of the good example of Obama will change Africa forever. But please, the think is after the fact, not before.


Fruugal

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Chuck WOW being sarcastic? Very cleverly sarcastic at that!


Lol. True, I wasnt specific on the other four presidents mentioned. First, I wasnt trying to get into a debate, but just provide perspective. The perspective that arises from common knowledge to whom the aforementioned presidents have been beholden to. That being varying corporate interests, banking interests and wall street. Going into specifics on each one would require such a long post, and the information, if nor already known, can readily be found in books, in newspaper archives (if you know where to look), and online. Believing that most of any presidents decisions are made according to what is best for the people, and country as a whole, is incredibly naive. History has repeatedly proven otherwise, especially in the latter half of the 20th century. Heck, like I said, if you didn't want to do all of that specific research even, you could research the true rate of unemployment throughout each presidency as a loose and quick gauge as to their effectiveness in raising quality of life, and therefore, how true they were to the people vs. special interests. Again, as a loose and quick, but meaningful, measure only.

Second, the Nobel Peace prize is nice enough, but doesn't behold Obama to anyone. There is no real political power behind that award, in that there is no monetary/economic or military impetus that enforces his behavior according to this award. If anything, I would think that this award will take some of the pressure of of him to have to be the worlds savior in Europes eyes, as it gives him an image that will stand in the minds of Europeans, despite his actions for the rest of the presidency. I guarantee that his decision making, as it would be for any president, will continue to be based on military/economic outcomes that are in line with his goals, whatever they truly are. Who cares if the Europeans are trying to be manipulative. If thats the only power they have, to give that award, then its expected of them to do so. But that doesn't meant that it means much to Obama, in terms of what he needs to do to accomplish his goals.

I'm not going to bite and comment on your perspectives on Afghanistan and what it means to "support the troops". Thats a well worn topic that doesn't need to be further argued, however passionate you and I might disagree. It would be interested to know what the majority of those kids over there would feel, however, if they were polled. I'm sure that most of them would choose to come home if given the chance. Its gotta be hell over there...


fruugal said on Sunday October 11th, 2009 06:14:09 PM

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Chuck WOW being sarcastic? Very cleverly sarcastic at that!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right over Andy's head Surprised he missed it.

Of course ALL other nominees were more worthy Mr/Ms. Fruugal.
Thank you for reading.


Gadget

Chuck got me, put a star next to your name, and thanks for telling me. I am aways careful when reading your post but sometimes the subtle irony and sarcasm even best me.

Thanks Frugal for clarification and Chuck for in a way agreeing with what I was saying, anybody is more qualified than Obama. This is an award for something already done, not for possible future Christmas.

I think asking the question, why is an obvious problem.


Asiabill

My first reaction a couple of days ago was of SURPRISE about this topic being posted and now I can see it has gotten more comments then most of your other Philippines' related posts. Such American political content makes you sound like one the many retired, ex-military American expats living here in the Philippines, sorry but really isn't there always a positive translation or analysis possible regarding American or international political news reports? I think it's another GREAT OMEN for the FUTURE of keeping the "AMERICAN DREAM" alive around the world just like, what would have seemed impossible event of anybody with a name like "Barack Obama" getting elected in the USA. Such facts, now history, shows that even the smallest odds for the most depressed peoples on earth can change if / when they're able to make it to the States. And if not them, the new immigrants for their children and grandchildren. And withOUT "the American Dream" and withOUT the American population being the most shop-o-holic consumers in the world how would the USA maintain its world leadership????


Motorcycle Bob

Andy, as a person who has always worked hard, you might not feel BHO has done a good job if you were still paying taxes in the US.

The only people that I know personally that like him, have been on some sort of public dole for years, and are hoping that they will get more. I realize this is not representative of his fans as a whole, just my little sample. You must remember, the president does not really have a lot of power to improve a country, especially very quickly, but he can stifle a country's growth, and kill an economy. All he has to do is create uncertainty amongst those that create jobs. The business men I have talked to are on a wait and hold mentality right now. They do not want to invest in a business or create anything new until they figure out in what way the Government is going to go. They don't want to risk their money, then have the small profit margin taken away by some new Govt' regulation. As an example, the Obama Bucks that are being handed out for infrastructure repair are now supposed to go to Union people. The state where I live does not have many union workers, and as such has a very good standard of living. But these bucks are now going to other states. Anyone that was hoping to do well in construction due to theses Bucks, has had to reduce the number of people they can hire, since the Union Wages are so much more than the prevailing wages. Just one example where the Govt's policies have unintended negative results. That is the way with most Govt intervention in almost anything.

Kim, you said: *Stastics show that in the USA, people of color, do less well, than indigenous whites. Much the same as in Europe. These issues suggest implicit racism.* I disagree. This might show that the effects of past racism, which caused a large population of poor blacks with no hope to get ahead, but it does not indicate present racism. Yes, there is racism here, as there is everywhere to some extent. Both against blacks etc, and against whites etc. Something happened a while back. In the days of Martin Luther King, there were leaders that preached to the blacks to become solid citizens, to WORK to change the world, to be men. Somehow the culture changed until we get rap music telling the men to treat their women like w**res and promoting violence etc. What happened here? I don’t know. I have no solution. I work, and have worked with many black people in offices and have never found a difference between any of the races or any real problem between people that work together. I don’t even like that term racism, because we are ALL one race, the human race. There is no real, or at least visible, racism that I see in the places I have worked, but there is a certain tension in some cases if the blacks are far outnumbered by others. That tension is to try and not offend and be called a racist. There is always the concern of a lawsuit. It takes years of hard work to create a good reputation, and mere accusation to destroy it.

What I would like to see is more people of the black communities, and the entertainment communities, and all the people, working to reduce the promotion and glorification of violence. I want people to STOP being so tolerant. We keep promoting tolerance of everyone. Even behaviors that are bad and dangerous. Look at some of the crap on TV. How about we use some good old fashioned disapproval for a change. When someone we know or any public figure behaves badly, how about we let them know we don't like it. Show them we disapprove. Say to them, *Don’t to that in public. Or at all for some things*. We have become a nation, or maybe a world of people who tolerate anything, except intolerance.

Ya' know, if you count the number of words I write and divide by 100 you can tell how many cups of coffee I had during the day.


Gadget

Stridzi, you are talking cliches, not true knowledge of the world.
You say,
"No history... (very short history i mean) 200 years?"
Answer
- This is why we are not as racist, our melting pot broke down your 1000's of yeas of Patriarch, Nobility, Status Quo, Racist situation. What was it in 2000 the Swiss finally needed to make a law it was illegal to deny the Holocaust. Switzerland which I spent a month in is a closed society, not evolving.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriarch

The very culture you are saying is great, the same European culture that has not changed for centuries is the problem in Europe. There is a good old boys club in Europe that allows racism to exist, it is so organized they know how to be politically correct 10 times better than the USA.

Mark my words, Europe is being invade by Afghanistan, Middle East, Africans, and the Eastern Europe folks are moving West, all hell is going to break, there is going to be race wars in Europe.

It is easy to say you are not racist in places like Switzerland where everyone is white-bread and just a few Thailand wives. Sweden has 1 million Islamic people in a country of about 13 million. I have already heard people screaming from Sweden.

The USA knows how to deal with Racism. Europe has a problem of supremest attitudes, your post is permeated with the idea that your culture is supreme to our. Everything you write prove this.