Sorry, my Superlative problem confused you, but truly I am not sorry. I just said that because it sounds good.
I said "Hate," I truly mean that tourist mildly annoy me.
In grammar the superlative of an adjective or adverb is the greatest form of adjective or adverb which indicates that something has some feature to a greater degree than anything it is being compared to in a given context.
Maybe I said,
"I hate tourist."
Cannot really remember, but I am sure this is my Indiana way of thinking, even if I did not say it, I would think this way.
I do not Hate tourist, if I see a foreighner, he or she is always a tourist.
(Always is a superlative I think.)
99.99 percent of the time, the foreigners I meet are tourist.
I like their normal people side.
I do not like their I am tourist side.
Fortunately, expats tend to be the normal people side more and less of the "I am a tourist." side less.
I know this, but I forget when I am tired, I know that readers are often too literal. Writers sit around trying to choose politically correct words, that will offend the least amount of people. I just write into this box my thoughts, then get on with my life.
It takes me about 15 minutes to write a Blog post, while I suspect the average person take about two hours. I do not put a lot of thought into them...
Hmm, that was by accident, some type of superlative sentence. I will put a lot of time into writing a Travel Tip, my opinions take minutes. If I did not included the stupid photos, It would take less than 10 minutes. (Stupid, this causes people problems, there is no way for a photo to be stupid.)
I hate to say it, (Superlative again.)
Readers jump in and feel empowered on comments, the ones that understand my intentions are not confused.
Readers try to grab onto an absolute, I give them a superlative and they are hooked. I do this naturally, I am not doing it by design, well, that is not true. I do not think in absolute clear thoughts, they come in streams of confusion and work their way towards clarity.
It is not possible for a person to exude the stereotype of a tourist for longer than a few minute at a time. They then revert to their normal persona from their home city, country and culture, they then are interesting.
People go on vacations, the will take on this tourist personality. The wear their camera around their necks, they take group photos, talk loud, and act as if they are extremely happy. As if everyone from the city they are in loves them, they spend large, they splurge, they get drunk, they are an obnoxious bunch who thinks the owner of the restaurant should be grateful they came to spend money.
The do not want to blend in, they came on their luxury vacation to be rich for one week of the year, they are on vacation.
I think the above could be called "Guru Talk."
"Guru Talk" is what millions of people could use to jerk their present opinions and ideas of the world outside their hometowns / cities. And who else to deliver it then us who have lived lives "less normal" as your one-liner goes who have been NOT ONLY doing our thing but prospering at it at least as much or more than milions of middle class people bound by "salary slavery" and the "I owe I owe so Off to Work I Go" lifestyles who show up to jobs everyday. That's one bad aspect of the great availability of travel guidebooks like Lonely Planet, Moon Publications and The Rough Guide is travelers and tourist don't interact nearly as much as before since anyone who puts out U$20 to U$30 is an automatic "expert".